🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.